Materiality Topics
Materiality Assessment GRI 3-1 (2021)
GGC conducted materiality assessment with the principle of double materiality assessment by selecting and assessing Material Topics that are material to the development of GGC’s sustainability, together with topics aligned with the expectations of all Stakeholder groups. The Sustainability Report is prepared with reference to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards 2022, the Integrated Reporting (IR) Framework of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), and the guidelines for the Annual Registration Statement / Annual Report (Form 56-1 One Report). In accordance with the GRI Standards, the prioritization of Material Topics comprises four steps as follows:
GGC consolidates information related to business operations across the value chain, both internal and external, in the sustainability context across economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Information is obtained through engagements with Stakeholders and experts, reviews of global and industry trends related to material issues, and reference to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to compare with GGC’s strategic direction and operational challenges. In addition, GGC conducts discussions and interviews with relevant Stakeholder groups. A materiality assessment or a review of the identification of Material Topics is conducted annually to identify key issues, changes, and potential impacts on GGC in a timely manner.
GGC conducts interviews and gathers input from Management and six key internal and external Stakeholder groups: Stakeholders, Investors and Analysts; Community Society and Environment; Government; Employees; Suppliers and Business Partners; and Customers, together with relevant industry experts, to capture views, expectations, and concerns for each topic.
For the Double Materiality Assessment, GGC considers impacts on GGC as well as impacts on key external Stakeholders The analysis covers both positive and negative impacts, together with related risks and opportunities, arising from sustainability Material Topics, to ensure a comprehensive assessment that reflects perspectives across stakeholder groups.
After identifying impacts from Material Topics in Step 2, GGC consolidates feedback from Stakeholders and experts to assess positive and negative impacts on the economy, society, and the environment, including human rights. Assessment considers the likelihood of occurrence and the severity of impacts. For severity, GGC considers the scale (area or number of people affected), scope (extent of impact), and remediability (the ability to address, restore, or remediate impacts), particularly for potential negative impacts
| Financial Materiality |
Reviewed risks and opportunities identified through stakeholder engagement, including in-depth interviews Assessed the significance of each risk and opportunity based on:
|
| Impact Materiality |
Reviewed environmental and social impacts identified through stakeholder engagement, including in-depth interviews and online surveys. Classified each impact as:
Assessed the significance of each impact based on:
|
GGC integrates stakeholder feedback with expert judgment to assess and score each of the 13 material topics across both Impact Materiality and Financial Materiality dimensions. The Company then uses the assessment results, together with its organizational context, targets, and strategy, to prioritize the material topics, which are presented to the Sustainability Development Committee, Executive Management, and the Corporate Governance Committee for consideration and approval for disclosure across relevant dimensions.
The materiality assessment prioritization process is incorporated into GGC’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) discussions to reinforce transparency, clarity, and accuracy of information. In addition, the materiality assessment process, Stakeholder engagement process, and data collection and evaluation process are verified by an independent external assurance provider. The assurance statement is provided in the Appendix of the report.
Report Content Defining Process

Result of Materiality Assessment GRI 3-2 (2021)
| Most Important Material Topics |
|
| Fundamental |
|
Material Topics and Management of Material Topics GRI 3-3 (2021)
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Creates opportunities to develop and expand markets for low-carbon and specialty products that align with evolving customer demand and sustainability trends.
- Generates new revenue opportunities through carbon credit trading and the development of carbon credit-related business activities
Negative Impacts
- Climate change-induced physical impacts on agricultural feedstocks, such as droughts, floods, and storms, may disrupt production, reduce raw material availability, and affect supply chain continuity.
- Failure to adapt to evolving environmental regulations may increase compliance costs, carbon credit procurement expenses, and investments required for greenhouse gas emissions reduction, leading to higher operating and production costs.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Effective implementation of greenhouse gas emissions reduction and climate change adaptation initiatives strengthens livelihood of the communities, customers, investors, and other stakeholders.
- Enhances market access and business opportunities in low-carbon products provide more alternatives to customers and business partners, driving the growth of low carbon economy
Negative Impacts
- Inadequate climate action or failure to keep pace with evolving ESG expectations and the transition to a low-carbon economy may limit customers, business partners, investors, and local communities in achieving their own sustainability and climate objectives, while increasing their exposure to climate-related risks.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
GRI
- GRI 305 Emission 2016: SOx, NOx and other significant air emissions (GRI 305-7)
- GRI 303 Water and Effluent 2018: Water Withdrawal (GRI 303-3), Water Discharge (GRI 303-4), Water Consumption (GRI 303-5)
- GRI 306 Waste 2020: Waste Generated (GRI 306-3), Waste Diverted from Disposal (GRI 306-4), Waste Directed to Disposal (GRI 306-5)
- GRI 302 Energy 2016: Energy Consumption within the organization (GRI 302-1), Total energy consumption outside the organization (GRI 302-2); Energy intensity (GRI 302-3)
- GRI 305 Emissions 2016: Direct (Scope 1) GHG Emissions (GRI 305-1), Energy Indirect (Scope 2) GHG Emissions (GRI 305-2), Other Indirect (Scope 3) GHG Emission (GRI 305-3)
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Responsible supply chain management based on fair trade principles, together with collaboration with suppliers and farmers, enhances ESG standards, strengthens transparency and stakeholder trust, improves the security of raw material supply, reduces cost volatility, and supports the Company's long-term sustainable growth.
Negative Impacts
- Developing a sustainable supply chain requires significant investment and resources for supplier selection, monitoring, and performance assessment, increasing operational costs and complexity. Procurement processes may become more time-consuming and less flexible, particularly during the transition to a more sustainable supply chain.
- Encouraging farmers to adopt sustainable agricultural practices requires time and demonstrable outcomes. Failure to achieve this transition may affect the security and reliability of raw material supply.
- Failure to improve supply chain sustainability may result in higher raw material costs, reduced continuity of raw material supply, and adverse impacts on the Company's operational efficiency and long-term competitiveness.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Capacity building and technical support for farmers enhance agricultural productivity, improve the quality and availability of raw materials, and strengthen long-term income generation and livelihood security.
- Collaboration between the Company and farmers strengthens supply chain resilience, enhances the security of raw material supply, and fosters long-term relationships with suppliers and business partners.
- A stable supply of high-quality raw materials enables reliable product delivery to customers while reinforcing investor and business partner confidence in the Company's operational resilience and long-term business potential.
Negative Impacts
- Fluctuations in agricultural raw material prices and availability, together with uncertainty in government policies, may adversely affect the income, livelihood security, and production planning of farmers and raw material suppliers.
- Uncertainty in the supply of biodiesel and methanol arising from geopolitical factors, such as developments in the Middle East, may result in delays or insufficient product deliveries to customers.
- Supply chain disruptions may undermine customer and business partner confidence, weaken business relationships, and increase dependence on alternative suppliers or raw material sources in the future.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
Website:
GRI
- GRI 308 Supplier Environmental Assessment 2016: Disclosure GRI 308-1 New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria
- GRI 414 Suppliers Social Assessment 2016: Disclosure GRI 414-1 New Suppliers that were screened using social criteria
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Effective corporate governance reduces business risks, strengthens regulatory compliance, and enhances organizational management and operational efficiency.
- Strengthens the Company's credibility, creating business opportunities and supporting sustainable long-term growth.
Negative Impacts
- Governance or ethical failures, such as fraud, corruption, or non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, may result in regulatory penalties, legal costs, reputational damage, and the loss of business opportunities.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Strong corporate governance and transparent business practices enhance the confidence and returns for shareholders, investors, business partners, customers, employees, and other stakeholders, while fostering long-term business relationships.
Negative Impacts
- Fraud, corruption, or ineffective corporate governance may undermine the confidence of shareholders, investors, business partners, and other stakeholders, adversely affecting business relationships and shareholder value.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
GRI
- GRI 2 General Disclosure 2021
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Effective risk management reduces the likelihood and impact of risks, supports informed decision-making, and strengthens business continuity.
- Enhances the confidence of investors, business partners, and other stakeholders, while improving the Company's resilience to uncertainty and changing business conditions.
Negative Impacts
- Ineffective risk management may result in financial losses, operational disruptions, and non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
- Failure to identify or respond to risks in a timely manner may adversely affect the Company's reputation, stakeholder confidence, and long-term competitiveness
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- An effective risk management and corporate governance framework, together with transparent business practices, strengthens investor and stakeholder confidence and returns from the Company's long-term resilience, stability, and growth potential.
- Diversifying the business portfolio toward higher value-added biochemical products with lower price volatility enhances the Company's competitiveness, reduces dependence on commodity-based products, and strengthens the confidence of customers, investors, and business partners in the Company's sustainable growth.
Negative Impacts
- Volatility in agricultural feedstocks resulting from climate conditions, seasonal fluctuations in palm oil prices, and regulatory constraints may disrupt production continuity and affect the Company's ability to generate revenues, hence lower returns to shareholders and investors.
- Planned plant shutdowns and external factors, such as fluctuations in raw material prices and transportation costs, may affect product delivery, customer confidence, and relationships with business partners.
- Uncertainty in raw material supply may reduce the Company's ability to undertake long-term business planning and weaken its bargaining power with suppliers. This highlights the importance of proactive stakeholder communication and effective relationship management during supply chain disruptions.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
Website:
GRI
- GRI 301 Material 2016: Material used by weight or volume (GRI 301-1)
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Product stewardship throughout the product life cycle ensures product safety, compliance with applicable standards and regulatory requirements, and reduces regulatory compliance risks.
- The development of sustainable products and the use of circular materials enhance product value, strengthen competitive differentiation, and foster innovation across the Company's product portfolio.
- Sustainable products, including specialty products and green methanol, create opportunities for premium pricing, improve gross margins, and expand the Company's customer base in high-value markets.
Negative Impacts
- Managing products throughout their life cycle in accordance with safety and sustainability standards requires significant investment in research and development (R&D), as well as higher testing and product certification costs.
- The adoption of circular materials and alternative feedstocks may be constrained by cost, quality, and supply chain availability, potentially increasing production costs and affecting operational continuity.
- Failure to meet regulatory requirements, industry standards, or evolving market expectations for sustainability may result in lost business opportunities, reduced competitiveness, and declining market share, particularly in specialty product and low-carbon product markets.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Effective implementation of greenhouse gas emissions reduction and climate change adaptation initiatives enhances the Company's credibility and strengthens the confidence of communities, customers, investors, and other stakeholders.
- Supports customers and business partners in achieving their sustainability and decarbonization objectives by providing low carbon products and services that align with growing ESG expectations and demand for low-carbon solutions.
Negative Impacts
- Products that fail to meet quality or safety standards may adversely affect the health, safety, and confidence of customers and consumers.
- Insufficient transparency regarding product information or sourcing may prevent customers, business partners, and other stakeholders from effectively assessing product sustainability attributes and making informed decisions.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
Website:
GRI
- GRI 301 Material 2016: Material used by weight or volume (GRI 301-1)
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Systematic human capital management, encompassing capability development, employee well-being, and a supportive working environment, enhances workforce productivity, strengthens employee engagement, and supports the long-term retention of high-potential talent.
- Continuous investment in employees enhances the Company's competitiveness, reduces recruitment and employee replacement costs, and supports sustainable business growth.
Negative Impacts
- Implementing comprehensive human capital policies may require significant financial resources and management effort, increasing operational complexity and necessitating continuous investment in talent development and retention.
- Excessive workloads, long working hours, or frequent meetings may increase the risk of employee burnout, leading to higher absenteeism, lower productivity, and increased employee turnover. This can result in higher human resource costs and adversely affect the Company's overall operational performance.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Promoting local employment and workforce development through internships and local hiring creates career opportunities, enhances the capabilities and quality of life of local communities, strengthens trust and relationships between the Company and its stakeholders, and supports sustainable local economic development.
Negative Impacts
- Insufficient investment in employee development may limit opportunities for employees to enhance their skills and advance their careers, reducing employee engagement and long-term retention.
- Skills gaps and high employee turnover may negatively affect customers, local communities, and business partners by reducing service quality, delaying project delivery, and limiting the Company's ability to consistently meet stakeholder expectations.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
Website:
GRI
- GRI 405 Diversity and Equal Opportunity 2016: Ratio of basis salary and remuneration (GRI 405-2)
- GRI 2 General Disclosure 2021 (GRI 2-7)
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Proactive, transparent, and inclusive community engagement helps build trust and strengthen the Company's social license to operate, supporting long-term business continuity.
- Effective stakeholder engagement and grievance management mechanisms help address community concerns, reduce conflicts, and strengthen the management of social risks.
- Strong relationships with local communities help minimize project delays, reduce costs associated with disputes or legal proceedings, and enhance operational continuity.
Negative Impacts
- Maintaining effective community relationships requires significant time, financial resources, and ongoing stakeholder engagement efforts, increasing operational costs.
- Balancing the expectations and perspectives of diverse stakeholder groups may increase the complexity of decision-making processes and extend project implementation timelines.
- Inadequate community engagement or ineffective management of stakeholder concerns may lead to community opposition, project delays, increased costs, operational disruptions, or legal disputes, adversely affecting the Company's financial performance and long-term reputation.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Communities benefit from social development initiatives, such as reforestation programs, knowledge transfer, and community development activities, which enhance quality of life and strengthen local self-reliance.
- Ongoing community engagement fosters trust, collaboration, and strong relationships between the Company, local communities, and other stakeholders, supporting long-term shared development.
- Empowering resilient and self-reliant communities strengthens social capital and contributes to sustainable economic, social, and environmental development at the local level.
Negative Impacts
- Failure to sustain community development initiatives or adequately address community needs may reduce development benefits and limit opportunities for communities to strengthen their capabilities and self-reliance.
- Inadequate stakeholder engagement and communication may limit local communities' and other stakeholders' ability to participate meaningfully in decision-making, express concerns, and access information that may affect their livelihoods, well-being, or environment.
- If local communities are unable to become self-reliant in the long term, they may remain dependent on corporate support, potentially undermining the sustainability of community development and the resilience of collaborative partnerships in the future.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
Website:
GRI
- GRI 201 Economic Performance 2016: Community Investment (GRI 201-1)
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Effective product quality management and customer relationship management ensure that products are safe, meet quality standards, and fulfill customer expectations, thereby enhancing customer satisfaction, trust, and the Company's reputation.
- A customer-centric approach, supported by the continuous improvement of products and services, strengthens customer loyalty, increases repeat business, reduces customer acquisition costs, and contributes to stable long-term revenue generation.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Customers and business partners benefit from products and solutions that better address their needs through collaborative product development, while gaining access to more sustainable and value-added products.
- Continuous communication and collaboration strengthen trust, foster long-term partnerships, and promote knowledge sharing, contributing to a resilient business ecosystem and sustainable mutual growth.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
Website:
GRI
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Transparent management and disclosure of biodiversity-related information enhance corporate credibility and support ESG-focused investors in making informed investment decisions.
- Biodiversity and sustainable sourcing assessments and certifications strengthen the Company's competitiveness, expand business opportunities, and improve preparedness for emerging biodiversity-related regulations and market expectations.
Negative Impacts
- Failure to comply with current or emerging biodiversity-related regulations and requirements may increase operational costs, expose the Company to regulatory and compliance risks, and potentially limit market access.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Biodiversity-conscious operations contribute to the conservation of natural resources, promote sustainable supply chain management, and create shared value for society.
- Transparent management and disclosure of biodiversity performance enhance the confidence of investors, customers, and business partners while supporting biodiversity conservation, responsible sourcing, and long-term environmental sustainability.
Negative Impacts
- Inadequate biodiversity management and disclosure may undermine the confidence of investors, customers, and business partners, affecting investment and business decisions. It may also contribute to adverse impacts on ecosystems, natural resources, and local communities, while increasing stakeholder concerns regarding the Company's environmental performance
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
GRI
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Transparent and ongoing communication regarding environmental impacts strengthens community trust, reduces conflicts, and supports the Company's social license to operate and long-term business continuity.
Negative Impacts
- Inadequate or non-transparent communication on environmental impacts may lead to conflicts with local communities, undermining the Company's reputation, stakeholder trust, and operational continuity.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Communities and other stakeholders receive accurate and transparent environmental information and are able to participate in monitoring environmental issues, allowing stakeholders to make meaningful decisions
Negative Impacts
- Insufficient environmental communication may increase concerns over pollution-related impacts, reduce community trust, and lead to complaints, disputes, or conflicts between the Company and its stakeholders.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
GRI
- GRI 305 Emission 2016: SOx, NOx and other significant air emissions (GRI 305-7)
- GRI 303 Water and Effluent 2018: Water Withdrawal (GRI 303-3), Water Discharge (GRI 303-4), Water Consumption (GRI 303-5)
- GRI 306 Waste 2020: Waste Generated (GRI 306-3), Waste Diverted from Disposal (GRI 306-4), Waste Directed to Disposal (GRI 306-5)
- GRI 302 Energy 2016: Energy Consumption within the organization (GRI 302-1), Total energy consumption outside the organization (GRI 302-2); Energy intensity (GRI 302-3)
- GRI 305 Emissions 2016: Direct (Scope 1) GHG Emissions (GRI 305-1), Energy Indirect (Scope 2) GHG Emissions (GRI 305-2), Other Indirect (Scope 3) GHG Emission (GRI 305-3)
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Effective occupational health and safety (OHS) management reduces workplace accidents and operational disruptions while improving workforce productivity and ensuring business continuity.
- Promoting a strong safety culture through training, risk assessments, and emergency preparedness helps mitigate legal and operational risks, strengthens stakeholder confidence, and enhances the Company's reputation.
Negative Impacts
- Ineffective occupational health and safety management may result in workplace accidents, injuries or fatalities, operational disruptions, and significant financial losses.
- Failure to comply with occupational health and safety regulations or standards may lead to legal penalties, reputational damage, and reduced trust among employees and other stakeholders.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Promoting a strong safety culture and continuously enhancing employee capabilities strengthen the confidence and trust of local communities, investors, business partners, and other stakeholders.
- Prioritizing occupational health and safety helps minimize risks to surrounding communities while safeguarding the health, safety, and well-being of employees and other stakeholders.
Negative Impacts
- A single occupational health and safety incident may adversely affect employees and surrounding communities, while undermining the confidence of investors, business partners, and other stakeholders in the Company.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
Website:
GRI
- GRI 403 OHS 2018: Work Related injuries (GRI 403-9), Works Related Ill health (GRI 403-10)
- Number of process event safety (OGSS OG13), to be replaced by GRI 306 Waste 2016 (GRI 306-3) which is topic standard disclosure for 2021 O&G Sector Standard Ref.No. 11.8.2, 11.8.3
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Respecting and protecting human rights throughout the value chain helps reduce legal and operational risks while strengthening the Company's long-term sustainability.
- Effective human rights management enhances the confidence of customers, investors, and business partners, supporting the Company's competitiveness and long-term business growth.
Negative Impacts
- Human rights violations may result in legal or trade sanctions, reputational damage, and a loss of trust among customers, investors, and business partners.
- The loss of key customers or restricted market access due to human rights-related issues may have a significant adverse impact on the Company's revenue and overall business performance.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Adhering to internationally recognized human rights and labor standards enhances the confidence of customers, investors, business partners, and other stakeholders.
- Achieving recognized standards, such as SMETA, and integrating climate justice considerations into business practices strengthen market access and create opportunities for collaboration with global customers and business partners.
Negative Impacts
- Failure to comply with human rights and labor standards or to meet stakeholder expectations may undermine the confidence of customers and business partners, limiting business opportunities and access to international markets.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
Website:
GRI
- GRI 412: Human Rights Assessment 2016
SDGs
Impact to Company
Positive Impacts
- Effective cybersecurity and data protection management reduces the risks of cyberattacks and data breaches, strengthens customer and business partner trust, and supports business continuity.
- Robust cybersecurity governance and internal controls help minimize system recovery costs, business disruptions, and legal risks, while improving data management efficiency and ensuring compliance with applicable regulations.
Negative Impacts
- Cybersecurity incidents or data breaches may result in financial losses, system recovery costs, regulatory penalties, and operational disruptions.
- The complexity of cybersecurity investments and governance may increase operational costs and reduce organizational agility. In addition, insufficient employee awareness or adaptation to evolving cyber threats may increase internal cybersecurity risks.
Impact to External Stakeholders
Positive Impacts
- Protecting personal and organizational data through robust security measures enhances the confidence of customers, business partners, investors, and other stakeholders that information is managed securely and in compliance with applicable data protection regulations.
- Strong data governance and responsible AI governance help mitigate privacy and data protection risks while fostering stakeholder trust in the Company's use of data and digital technologies.
Negative Impacts
- Cybersecurity incidents or data breaches may compromise the privacy and security of customers', business partners', and other stakeholders' information, reducing trust and confidence in the Company.
- Inadequate data governance or irresponsible use of AI may raise concerns regarding privacy, ethics, and data protection, adversely affecting stakeholder relationships and trust.
Impact Materiality
Financial Materiality
Impact Boundary, Key Stakeholders and Human Rights
Within Organization
Outside Organization
Management Approach and Key Initiatives
GRI
SDGs
Sample of Management of Significant Material Topics
| Material Issues | Corporate risk factor | Targets and Progress | Corporate KPI* | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Climate Strategy and Energy Management | Strategic Risk: Climate Action Towards Net Zero Risk – risks associated with the Company’s readiness to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions targets. |
|
|
Climate Strategy Energy Management |
| Supply Chain Management and Promotion of Sustainable Palm Oil Production Standards (RSPO) |
Operational Risk: Risks related to quality, price volatility, and availability of agricultural raw materials. Reputational Risk: Risks associated with loss of corporate reputation due to procurement practices that cause environmental and social impacts. |
|
|
Value Chain Management | Global Green Chemicals |
| Human Capital Development and Wellbeing | Business as Usual Risk: Operational Risk. |
|
|
Our Employee |
*Remark: The Corporate KPI is accounted to 70% of Executive Individual
For more information, see: GGC Materiality External Impact Valuation 2025